Craig Silverman’s new structured approach to covering Apple

The creative new project is a good way to keep up on Apple rumors — and hold journalists accountable for anonymous sourcing.

By Bill Adair – March 11, 2015 | Print this article

The latest example of structured journalism slices and dices rumors about Apple.

The project, part of Craig Silverman’s impressive rumor-tracking on Emergent.info, is a deep dive on all things Apple. It tracks more than 70 claims about things such as the trackpad of the new MacBook, the release date of iOS 8.2 and even the amount of gold in the high-end Apple Watch.

Silverman has partnered with Fast Company magazine, which has collected the rumors in a single article. The partnership gives Silverman’s innovative work a larger audience and some business-mag cred.

Craig Silverman
Craig Silverman

Like other rumors Silverman and his team follow on Emergent, they have identified the mishmash of speculation and anonymously sourced tidbits about Apple and separated them into bite-sized claims that readers can follow as Apple makes its official announcements.

For example, some rumors about the pricing structure of the Watch have now been rated True, such as the report in AppleInsider that the stainless-steel model will cost $499-549. But others have been rated False, such as the report in TechCrunch that the gold version will cost $1,200. (Actual price: $10,000+)

Silverman’s Apple rumor tracking is a great example of structured journalism. It allows people interested in the company and its products to get the latest about what’s true, what’s not and what’s still just speculation. Because it’s structured, readers can see all the False, True or Unverified claims. 

It’s also a great way to hold journalists accountable. Assuming the project continues, we’ll eventually be able to see whether, say, MacRumors has a better record of anonymous reports than Re/code.

As of March 10, one day after the announcement, Emergent had rated 28 of the rumors False and 22 True.

Back to top

No cold pizza: Notes from a structured journalism planning session

Structured journalists meet in Cambridge to plan more events and promotion in the next year.

By Bill Adair – February 23, 2015 | Print this article

We held Friday’s meeting in a windowless conference room because that’s where we go when we discuss structured journalism. This year, our meeting was at Google’s office in Cambridge, Mass., and our host David Smydra upheld the tradition.

It’s not that we fear sunlight. It’s just a quirk of scheduling. You may recall that last year’s meeting, our first, was in a windowless room at Reuters where we munched on cold pizza. This year, we got to enjoy Google’s amazing lunch buffet.

Around the table: David, Reg Chua of Reuters, Laura and Chris Amico, the creators of Homicide Watch, and me.

The goal for our second annual structured journalism strategy session was to assess how we did in our first year and set goals for the next 12 months.

A professorial Android greeted us at Google's Cambridge office.
A professorial Android greeted us at Google’s Cambridge office.

We discussed our successes. We held well-attended panels at the International Journalism Festival in Italy and the Online News Association meeting in Chicago and we started this mailing list. We also wrote blog posts and articles, although we each felt we could have done more.

We discussed our new structured projects: Laura did a demo of a cool one she’s leading at the Boston Globe, which should be published in the next couple of weeks; Chris did a demo of two structured sites he’s built for Frontline, Ballot Watch, which follows the changes in state voting laws, and Ebola Outbreak: How the Virus Spread.

I showed two mock-ups of websites I’m building with Duke students, one to track and rate medical studies (a project now on hold because we concluded it’s too complex a subject) and one that follows cases of athletes charged with crimes. We’re calling it Rule 46, after the NHL rule on fighting.

David did demos of some Google products that can help structured journalism: Google Consumer Surveys, which can generate revenue, and Google Newsstand, which publishes free and premium articles from various sources and can display structured content in an attractive and readable form.

Reg Chua, David Smydra, Bill Adair, Laura Amico and Chris Amico.
Reg Chua, David Smydra, Bill Adair, Laura Amico and Chris Amico.

A common theme in our discussions: the need for narrative and context in structured journalism. Questions and suggestions from the group made me realize that our sports crime project needed an additional feature — articles — to help readers better understand the structured content. Readers are interested in stories, David said, and we shouldn’t “outsource how the narrative gets built” to the user.

We discussed business goals and agreed that the long-tail potential and new, innovative content formats of structured journalism projects provide different kinds of opportunities to earn revenue. It’s important for both editorial and business-side leaders to plan for revenue opportunities from the start.

We agreed to keep speaking and writing about structured journalism. We’re holding a panel titled Why Structure is the Future of Journalism at the International Journalism Festival in April and we hope to hold another one at ONA15 in Los Angeles. We’ve also started collecting a list of structured journalism projects that I’ll be publishing on the website of the Duke Reporters’ Lab. And we’d like to get this listserv more involved in developing the ideas of structured journalism and spreading the word — perhaps a larger group meeting later this year would be useful, too. (Let us know if you would be interested in that!)

We’ll be holding another planning session next year, probably at Duke. I’ll find us a windowless room.

Back to top

Soft opening

Our website has been redesigned to highlight our new focus on fact-checking and structured journalism

By Bill Adair – December 7, 2014 | Print this article

Welcome to the new website of the Duke Reporters’ Lab!

You’re getting a preview of our new site, which will have its official launch in January. With the help of the talented team at Cuberis, we’ve redesigned the site to highlight our new focus on fact-checking and structured journalism.

Please feel free to browse the site, particularly our database of fact-checking sites around the world. It’s an impressive list – particularly when you see it on the map. You can zoom in and out over the continents and click the pushpins to get details on each site.

We’re still fact-checking our map of fact-checkers, so if you see anything that needs to be changed, email us at bill.adair@duke.edu.

 

Back to top

Creating new forms of journalism that put readers in charge

The creators of Homicide Watch, Connected China and PolitiFact met over pizza and agreed on a plan to promote structured journalism.

By Bill Adair – February 28, 2014 | Print this article

It’s been 20 years since the Internet began to disrupt journalism. It has turned our business upside down, but it’s also given us a new canvas to invent different ways of presenting information. It’s time to start reimagining the news story.

Last week, four of us gathered in a windowless conference room in New York to explore what we can do to nudge things along.

The participants were the creators of three projects that rely on new forms:

All three projects use a structured approach to present content in different ways. The animated diagrams of Connected China show you the family and government relationships that determine who has clout in that country; the lists and maps of Homicide Watch show who has been killed and where; the PolitiFact report cards reveal which politicians have earned the most Pants on Fires.

Homicide Watch, Connected China and PolitiFact are known as structured journalism because the articles contain fields of information that can be sorted and tallied. They provide readers with many ways to explore the content, both through individual articles and the data the articles create. Structured journalism puts the reader in charge.

“It’s a way of reporting that builds a comprehensive reporter’s notebook and then opens that notebook up to the public,” said Laura Amico. “There is no ‘old news’ in structured journalism, there is cumulative news. It is reporting that increases in value over time.”

There are a few other ventures that are experimenting with similar new forms, such as Circa, the app that atomizes the news into digestible chunks. But by and large, story forms are stuck in the past. We want more news organizations to experiment with structured journalism.

We began our New York meeting by trying to understand why media companies have largely failed to take advantage of the incredible power of the Web and mobile devices. We identified four forces that have stymied innovation:

  • Content Management Systems. They are designed to convert old media into new media and they provide little flexibility to experiment with new journalistic forms.
  • Newsroom culture. The rhythm in most newsrooms is based on a well-established work flow that produces predictable content. It’s not easy to suggest a wholesale change.
  • Product managers on the business side. They’re accustomed to selling the old recipe and often seem perplexed by new approaches.
  • Editors/news directors. They’ve got other priorities — such as having to choose people for another round of layoffs — and often don’t have the resources for a new venture.

Chua said editors need to get beyond the idea that “what’s new is what’s valuable. Sometimes it is. But sometimes it’s accumulated information and knowledge that is valuable.”

We then turned to the need for evangelism. What can the four of us do to get more news organizations to try innovative story forms?

We agreed to host a mini-conference in September before the Online News Association meeting in Chicago. It will allow us to demonstrate the promise of new story forms for industry leaders and innovators.

In the meantime, we’ll be writing and speaking about the new forms and encouraging organizations to do more experimentation. We invite you to join in these conversations by sharing your projects, ideas and hopes. #structuredjournalism

 

Back to top